Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

sexual assault

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • lawlessone2009
    replied
    I'm gonna stick my spade back in the shed... The hole I've dug is deep enough already...

    Leave a comment:


  • Boys don't cry
    replied
    I should have written :I "cross" him everyday.

    Not even "meet" because the length of time would be too long.

    Leave a comment:


  • Faith
    replied
    Every day?? How vain!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Boys don't cry
    replied
    Originally posted by Rights Fighter View Post
    There are times we all type out something that doesn't reflect exactly what we are trying to say...
    I know one of them,I look at him everyday in the mirror

    Leave a comment:


  • Faith
    replied
    Originally posted by lawlessone2009 View Post

    You guys are pretty sensitive just now.
    On a site which deals with painful subjects and people being affected by trauma, it really shouldn't surprise you that members are sensitive.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rights Fighter
    replied
    That's not how I read it either - best to commit no crime at all (let alone think about it) but then there are times we all type out something that doesn't reflect exactly what we are trying to say....

    I've known guys say that when they get out they will shoot their lying accuser then "at least I'll be in prison for something I've done". That might be said off the cuff but could be construed as a serious threat.

    Leave a comment:


  • RFLH
    replied
    having read the thread now - I understood what you meant, I think there has been a little too much leaping on the poster.

    Maybe I understod because my head is jumbled too!

    Leave a comment:


  • lawlessone2009
    replied
    Originally posted by Faith View Post
    Fair enough, and that is all very true, but regardless, it shouldn't make one want to go out and commit the crimes as they 'may as well' seeing as they'd get a lesser sentence.

    Maybe I am being overly sensitive but one has to have tact in a community such as this...

    Thanks for your input Izzy, and I am sure that you are right.
    We shall get back to topic.
    Miles off......

    It was me.... Bad explanation...

    You guys are pretty sensitive just now. A million posters pulling up a little line that was badly put by me. My head is jumbled, do not take Propananol! It makes you worse, well me anyway!

    Leave a comment:


  • lawlessone2009
    replied
    Originally posted by Izzy View Post
    I think the point he was making was that the punishment starts the minute you are FA, the repercussions can be bad when word leaks out, whereas if you have actually commited a crime, the punishment can be less or certainly less life changing. Thats how I read it, but I'm sure he will be back on to make it clear.
    Oops... This is in the area too.

    I'm pants at explaining myself!!!

    Communicate communicate communicate is my mantra... I've failed!

    Leave a comment:


  • lawlessone2009
    replied
    Originally posted by Izzy View Post
    It's not how I read it, but maybe it's the Scottish sarcasm that only we get. It's a knock at the system and soft sentencing for other crimes not the one of being FA, or thats how I read it.
    Nail, head, hit...

    Maybe I didn't put it across correctly...

    The 'Guilty' are treated better than those that are 'Not Guilty'... Basically what I was saying...

    You can actually COMMIT a crime and get a lesser sentence than if you find yourself falsely accused.......

    Leave a comment:


  • Faith
    replied
    Fair enough, and that is all very true, but regardless, it shouldn't make one want to go out and commit the crimes as they 'may as well' seeing as they'd get a lesser sentence.

    Maybe I am being overly sensitive but one has to have tact in a community such as this...

    Thanks for your input Izzy, and I am sure that you are right.
    We shall get back to topic.

    Leave a comment:


  • Izzy
    replied
    I think the point he was making was that the punishment starts the minute you are FA, the repercussions can be bad when word leaks out, whereas if you have actually commited a crime, the punishment can be less or certainly less life changing. Thats how I read it, but I'm sure he will be back on to make it clear.

    Leave a comment:


  • Faith
    replied
    This was the part that concerned me:

    '...the punishment is less than if you're falsely accused.'

    Seems to be the poster is referring to false allegations

    Leave a comment:


  • Izzy
    replied
    It's not how I read it, but maybe it's the Scottish sarcasm that only we get. It's a knock at the system and soft sentencing for other crimes not the one of being FA, or thats how I read it.
    Last edited by Izzy; 21 August 2012, 08:44 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rights Fighter
    replied
    Originally Posted by lawlessone2009

    Makes you actually want to go commit crimes as the punishment is less than if you're falsely accused.



    Faith said:

    Does it?

    I would be very concerned if you wanted to commit the crime you are accused of...

    I thought the same thing when I read it. What about the victim in that act of spite?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X