Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
sexual assault
Collapse
X
-
I'm gonna stick my spade back in the shed... The hole I've dug is deep enough already...
-
I should have written :I "cross" him everyday.
Not even "meet" because the length of time would be too long.
Leave a comment:
-
I know one of them,I look at him everyday in the mirrorOriginally posted by Rights Fighter View PostThere are times we all type out something that doesn't reflect exactly what we are trying to say...
Leave a comment:
-
That's not how I read it either - best to commit no crime at all (let alone think about it) but then there are times we all type out something that doesn't reflect exactly what we are trying to say....
I've known guys say that when they get out they will shoot their lying accuser then "at least I'll be in prison for something I've done". That might be said off the cuff but could be construed as a serious threat.
Leave a comment:
-
having read the thread now - I understood what you meant, I think there has been a little too much leaping on the poster.
Maybe I understod because my head is jumbled too!
Leave a comment:
-
Miles off......Originally posted by Faith View PostFair enough, and that is all very true, but regardless, it shouldn't make one want to go out and commit the crimes as they 'may as well' seeing as they'd get a lesser sentence.
Maybe I am being overly sensitive but one has to have tact in a community such as this...
Thanks for your input Izzy, and I am sure that you are right.
We shall get back to topic.
It was me.... Bad explanation...
You guys are pretty sensitive just now. A million posters pulling up a little line that was badly put by me. My head is jumbled, do not take Propananol! It makes you worse, well me anyway!
Leave a comment:
-
Oops... This is in the area too.Originally posted by Izzy View PostI think the point he was making was that the punishment starts the minute you are FA, the repercussions can be bad when word leaks out, whereas if you have actually commited a crime, the punishment can be less or certainly less life changing. Thats how I read it, but I'm sure he will be back on to make it clear.
I'm pants at explaining myself!!!
Communicate communicate communicate is my mantra... I've failed!
Leave a comment:
-
Nail, head, hit...Originally posted by Izzy View PostIt's not how I read it, but maybe it's the Scottish sarcasm that only we get. It's a knock at the system and soft sentencing for other crimes not the one of being FA, or thats how I read it.
Maybe I didn't put it across correctly...
The 'Guilty' are treated better than those that are 'Not Guilty'... Basically what I was saying...
You can actually COMMIT a crime and get a lesser sentence than if you find yourself falsely accused.......
Leave a comment:
-
Fair enough, and that is all very true, but regardless, it shouldn't make one want to go out and commit the crimes as they 'may as well' seeing as they'd get a lesser sentence.
Maybe I am being overly sensitive but one has to have tact in a community such as this...
Thanks for your input Izzy, and I am sure that you are right.
We shall get back to topic.
Leave a comment:
-
I think the point he was making was that the punishment starts the minute you are FA, the repercussions can be bad when word leaks out, whereas if you have actually commited a crime, the punishment can be less or certainly less life changing. Thats how I read it, but I'm sure he will be back on to make it clear.
Leave a comment:
-
This was the part that concerned me:
'...the punishment is less than if you're falsely accused.'
Seems to be the poster is referring to false allegations
Leave a comment:
-
I thought the same thing when I read it. What about the victim in that act of spite?
Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: